Powered by

Get Hosting
Apple did not mislead customers about water resistance since In iPhones.

Apple did not mislead customers about water resistance since In iPhones.

A federal judge in the US did reject an action lawsuit that was proposed, accusing Apple of misleading customers about the water-resistance on their phones. Since the launch of the iPhone 7, Apple has very much Marketed their iPhones as water-resistant while also claiming that some models could be submerged at a depth of four meters for 30 minutes.

Two people from New York and one from South Carolina did sue Apple in the Southern District of New York. They sued Apple for false and misleading misrepresentations They claimed that Apple was misrepresenting their iPhones So they could make those iPhones twice as expensive as they should have been.

Now a U.S. District Judge Denise Court has ruled that These people While there reasonably claim that Apple’s advertisement may mislead some customers, It does not mean those iPhones were damaged by liquid contact. And the judge has found no evidence of fraud and cited a lack of evidence.

The court also said that there was insufficient evidence to show that these people did rely on deceptive marketing claims when they chose to buy the iPhone. Apple thinks that water and dust resistance are not permanent. Conditions will deteriorate. They also claimed that the older the iPhone, the weaker its ability to resist water and dust. Also, Apple’s warranty does not cover liquid damage, so it is best to be careful when touching it with water. Well, Apple’s iPhones are pretty resistant to water damage and dust. There were a lot of assumptions that these people did claim, which was not true. This case is likely good as done.

Apple did not mislead customers about water resistance since In iPhones.

Apple did not mislead customers about water resistance since In iPhones.

A federal judge in the US did reject an action lawsuit that was proposed, accusing Apple of misleading customers about the water-resistance on their phones. Since the launch of the iPhone 7, Apple has very much Marketed their iPhones as water-resistant while also claiming that some models could be submerged at a depth of four meters for 30 minutes.

Two people from New York and one from South Carolina did sue Apple in the Southern District of New York. They sued Apple for false and misleading misrepresentations They claimed that Apple was misrepresenting their iPhones So they could make those iPhones twice as expensive as they should have been.

Now a U.S. District Judge Denise Court has ruled that These people While there reasonably claim that Apple’s advertisement may mislead some customers, It does not mean those iPhones were damaged by liquid contact. And the judge has found no evidence of fraud and cited a lack of evidence.

The court also said that there was insufficient evidence to show that these people did rely on deceptive marketing claims when they chose to buy the iPhone. Apple thinks that water and dust resistance are not permanent. Conditions will deteriorate. They also claimed that the older the iPhone, the weaker its ability to resist water and dust. Also, Apple’s warranty does not cover liquid damage, so it is best to be careful when touching it with water. Well, Apple’s iPhones are pretty resistant to water damage and dust. There were a lot of assumptions that these people did claim, which was not true. This case is likely good as done.